Federal election commission arose in june 2012 when shaun mccutcheon, an alabama businessman, and the republican national committee rnc, which manages the affairs of the national republican party, challenged fecas aggregate limits in u. He wished to donate more in amounts that would be permissible under the base limit but would violate the aggregate limit. Fec supreme court challenge to aggregate contribution limits could radically reshape the financing of federal elections on october 8, 20, the u. Shaun mccutcheon, a wealthy political donor, and the republican national committee contend that the. Fec,1 the supreme court held that the current aggregate limit on the total amount of money that an individual may contribute to all federal candidates, parties, and. Fec, in which plaintiffs shaun mccutcheon and the republican national committee are seeking to overturn aggregate limits for. The court could reject mccutcheons argument outright, thereby maintaining. The decision continued a trend of the roberts court of deregulating the area.
Fec is a supreme court case in which a narrow 54 majority struck down the limit on the total. The case involved whether congress had the right to limit the total amount of donations an individual can make, at the federal level, in an election cycle. Americans believe their elected representatives are more responsive to financial supporters than to constitu. Fec, lawyers for the petitioners speak to reporters and answered questions on the steps of the. Valeo 1976, the supreme court held that limits on contributions implicate fundamental first amendment interests, but that such limits may be imposed as long as they are closely. The american constitution society acs takes no position on specific legal or policy initiatives.
Fec, a challenge to the aggregate contribution limits. Federal election commission appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia no. Why mccutcheon decision is scarier than citizens united with landmark decision handed down today, heres what to know about mccutcheon v. Apr 16, 2014 federal election commission fec chairman lee goodman talks about how the supreme courts mccutcheon v. Federal election commission challenges the constitutionality of federal limits on the total an individual can contribute to federal candidates, political parties, and political action committees pacs. Plaintiff shaun mccutcheon, an alabama businessman and former member of the republican national committee, challenged that a biennial limit on overall individual contributions infringed upon a donors first amendment rights. Morrison october 2014 all expressions of opinion are those of the author or authors. In the 20112012 election cycle, appellant mccutcheon contributed to 16 different federal candidates, complying with the base limits applicable to each.
Nabpac urges the commission to recommend to congress that the limit on indexed for inflation. On april 2, 2014, the supreme court struck down the aggregate limits, holding that the aggregate limits did not meaningfully prevent. On april 2, 2014, the supreme court struck down the aggregate limits, holding that the aggregate limits did not. Federal election commission fec is the landmark 2014 u. In defense of mccutcheon v federal election commission by. Supreme court case in which the court ruled that campaign donations can be considered a form of free speech protected by the first amendment to the u. I have the announcement this morning in case 12536, mccutcheon v. Jul 11, 2017 the court heard arguments tuesday in the case of mccutcheon v. Argued march 24, 2009reargued september 9, 2009 decided january 21, 2010. Supreme court will hear oral argument in mccutcheon v. Mccutcheon v fec is a federal lawsuit that was argued before the u.
Fec, lawyers for the petitioners speak to reporters and answered questions on. By a vote of 54, the court ruled that the biennial aggregate limits are unconstitutional under the first amendment. At that time, fecas aggregate limits for twoyear election cycles. Campaign finance law at the time prevented any electioneeri. Commission fec or commission advance notice of proposed rulemaking anprm issued on october 17, 2014 notice 201412. Fec that struck down the aggregate limits on the amount an individual may contribute during a twoyear period to all federal candidates, parties and political action committees combined. The fec counters that mccutcheons argument, that the first amendment prohibits the imposition of aggregate contribution limits, is foreclosed by the courts holding in buckley v. Fec legal information institute cornell university. Campaign finance regulation constitutional law freedom of speech tweet facebook. Shaun mccutcheon, a wealthy political donor, and the republican national committee contend that the limits on political donations are. Legal director, center for competitive politics, alexandria, virginia.
The decision held that section 441 of the federal election campaign act feca, which imposed a limit on contributions an individual can make over a twoyear pe. Supreme court in the campaign finance case of mccutcheon v. Review the latest campaign finance decision to roll out of the supreme court. In defense of mccutcheon v federal election commission. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. The supreme court on wednesday struck down limits in federal law on the overall campaign contributions the biggest individual donors may. Money, money, money how the supreme courts decision in. On april 2, 2014, the supreme court issued a ruling in mccutcheon v. Brief of the cato institute as amicus curiae in support of plaintiffsappellants. Oct 08, 20 mccutcheon and the rnc argue that aggregate limits are unconstitutional because they place substantial burdens on an individuals first amendment rights.
Invalidation of the aggregate limits would multiply candidatetocandidate contributions and reinvigorate the. William mccutcheon 18701949, wales international rugby. Fec and the supreme courts return to buckley 97 thus, in mccutcheon the court provided some muchneeded clar ity by returning to its roots in, thereby resurrecting a nar. Fec 242 party or a partybased subgroup, much in the same way that base contribution limits cap the volume of money that the contributor can. Federal election commission audio transcription for opinion announcement april 02, 2014 part 1 in mccutcheon v. In october of 20, the supreme court heard oral arguments in mccutcheon v. Citizens united found that associations, corporations, and labor unions may not be prevented from making independent expenditures in connection with elections. Perfect for the life long learner, students of american government and the cray cray on the internets. Federal election commission audio transcription for oral argument october 08, 20 in mccutcheon v. The supreme court on wednesday struck down limits in federal law on the overall campaign contributions the biggest individual donors may make to. Shaun mccutcheon, american businessman and republican activist, plaintiff of mccutcheon v. Supreme court invalidated provisions of the federal election campaign act feca and the bipartisan campaign reform act bcra that imposed aggregate, or total, limits on contributions to political candidates and other contributions to party committees. Supreme court of the united states syllabus citizens united v.
The court heard arguments tuesday in the case of mccutcheon v. Federal election commission fec chairman lee goodman talks about how the supreme courts mccutcheon v. Mccutcheon and the other plaintiffs sued the federal election commission, arguing that the aggregate limit violated the first amendment by failing to serve a cognizable government interest and being prohibitively low. Introduction the first amendment of the united states constitution protects a persons right to political association as well as political expression. The brennan center is a nonpartisan public policy and law institute that focuses on fundamental issues of democracy and justice. Valeo,1 the supreme court subjected limits on political contributions to a lower level of constitutional scrutiny than limits on political expenditures. On appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia. Federal campaign finance laws previously limited contributions to a single candidate or committee, but also imposed limits on the amount that could be contributed to all candidates and committees.
Mccutcheon struck down the limit on the total amount that one wealthy donor is permitted to contribute. Click on a datetime to view the file as it appeared at that time. Audio transcription for opinion announcement april 02, 2014 part 2 in mccutcheon v. Election commission represented the most important election law decision since citizens united v. Brief for appellant shaun mccutcheon, supra note 6, at 12. On january 15, 2015, the brennan center submitted a comment in response thereto our previous comment, which attached hereto as is. Each of these contributions would have been compliant with the base contribution limits restricting the amounts that individuals may give to a particular candidate, party committee, or political action committee pac. The lawsuit challenged fec restrictions on the aggregate amount of donations to candidates in federal elections and to national political parties. On april 1, 2014, the court struck down these aggregate limits as failing to advance the accepted government interest in preventing quid pro quo corruption or the appearance thereof, and therefore impermissibly burdening first amendment rights. More importantly, this will shift the balance of power even further toward wealthy donors and away from ordinary citizens. A few months after the buckley court handed down its decision, congress amended the feca to distinguish 1 between contributions by persons and contributions by multicandidate political committees, and 2 among contributions to candidates and. Fec, in which plaintiffs shaun mccutcheon and the republican national committee are. Apr 15, 2014 on april 2, 2014, the supreme court issued a ruling in mccutcheon v.
651 1210 833 629 759 585 1079 778 45 767 1558 261 812 1310 1210 1003 1151 1456 1127 426 357 27 1416 1478 486 469 878 1169 167 1423 1319 530 780 591 1218 335 343 481